编程器厂家宣传上的相互攻击，挺好玩的。续

tudou1024

总出错另起一贴试试。前贴连接 http://diybcq.com/thread-147425-1-1.html
德国的这家




How many devices are supported?
支持多少台设备？

Approximately 6500 different programmable devices exist today. Some devices are produced by several manufacturers, resulting in about 10.000 different device names. However programmer manufacturers advertise with 40.000, 50.000, or even more than 60.000 supported devices - how is that possible?
目前大约有 6500 种不同的可编程器件。一些设备由多家制造商生产，导致大约 10.000 个不同的设备名称。但是，编程器制造商使用 40.000、50.000 甚至超过 60.000 个受支持的设备进行广告宣传 - 这怎么可能？

The answer is simple: The same device is just counted many times. For example, the same GAL16V8 from Lattice appears up to 400(!) times in the device list of an East European programmer manufacturer. Often nonexisting packages are also routinely added to the lists, such as DIL versions of devices that are not manufactured in DIL packages.
答案很简单：同一台设备只是被计数多次。例如，来自 Lattice 的相同GAL16V8在一家东欧编程器制造商的器件列表中出现了多达 400（！） 次。通常，不存在的封装也会定期添加到列表中，例如不是以 DIL 封装制造的器件的 DIL 版本。

For these reasons, the advertised number of devices has little meaning for device programmer comparison. For better transparency, Conitec publishes several device numbers for the GALEP device lists:
由于这些原因，公布的器件数量对于器件编程器比较几乎没有意义。为了提高透明度，Conitec 为 GALEP 设备列表发布了几个设备编号

    By Name - the real number of supported device algorithms.
    By Name - 支持的设备算法的实际数量。
    By Package - including the supported device packages.
    按软件包 - 包括支持的设备软件包。
    By Variants - including device variants that use the same programming algorithm.
    By Variants - 包括使用相同编程算法的设备变体。

An example: CAT93C46S, CAT93C46J, and CAT93C46K are only variants of CAT93C46 with the same programming algorithm, but CAT93C46-1.8 is a separate device with a different algorithm for low voltage.
例如：CAT93C46S、CAT93C46J 和 CAT93C46K 只是具有相同编程算法的 CAT93C46 的变体，但 CAT93C46-1.8 是具有不同低电压算法的单独器件。

The device numbers advertised by programmer manufacturers are usually based on the "by variants" count, while the real number of supported algorithms is kept secret. All claim nevertheless on their websites to offer the only honest device number, and lash out against the counting methods of their competitors. So it's not easy to see how many devices are really supported. Estimating from samples, we found the device count of a China based manufacturer inflated by a factor about 10, while a manufacturer from Eastern Europe achieves even factors up to 40 with the methods above. As long as manufacturers don't publish their real algorithm count, the only way to find the right programmer is directly checking the published lists against the devices that you'll need.
编程器制造商公布的设备编号通常基于 “按变体” 计数，而支持的算法的实际数量是保密的。尽管如此，所有人都在他们的网站上声称提供唯一诚实的设备号码，并猛烈抨击竞争对手的计数方法。因此，要看出真正支持多少设备并不容易。根据样本进行估计，我们发现一家中国制造商的设备数量夸大了大约 10 倍，而一家来自东欧的制造商使用上述方法实现了高达 40 倍的偶数。只要制造商不公布他们的真实算法计数，找到合适的程序员的唯一方法就是直接根据您需要的设备检查已发布的列表。

zhukai79

揭露一些真像，